For the past two days, I was reading The Witch of Portobello by Paulo Coelho. I traded books with Shakie, a good friend of mine, last Friday. In exchange for Ian Mc Ewan’s Atonement, I got the Coelho book and Sarah Dunant’s the Birth of Venus. I was first intrigued by Dunant’s novel, but after a while I decided to postpone reading it at a more opportune time. Meanwhile, I picked up Mr. Coellho’s new novel and began reading it on Friday evening.
The first page did not grip me in the same way that the first few words of the Alchemist did. Of course, I should be expecting this, after all, I never really liked the last Coelho book I had read years ago, which was By The River Piedra I Sat Down and Wept. However, I wanted to be fair with the guy- many sources refer to him as the most beloved author of our time. So I trudged along and read more.
However, just a few minutes ago, I finally dropped the book out of sheer boredom and complete frustration. To be honest, the book’s content does not deserve it’s illustrious title- at all. I was expecting to read a well-researched, well-paced story about a witch in the 21st century, and not the soapy tale of an adopted woman who felt herself to be, or whom the author made to be, an authority on so many things.
Clearly, I was not expecting to find rehashed sentences, cliched phrases, and endless references to the mystical and primary emotions, no matter that the novel was merely translated from the Portuguese. Now I understand why Coelho’s critics had bravely accused him of grammatical errors and plagiarism.
There was nothing to look forward to in the book, in fact it had felt like I was reading Wikipedia. Besides, in the beginning of the novel, we already know that the witch, referred to as Sherine or Athena, had died. Witches and Death- could anything be more predictable? Well, there is a twist in the end but I don’t think it can compensate for the blandness that this novel emanates even from the start.
The sentences furthermore, were way too simplistic, as if the audiences would care for nothing beyond the illustrious title and an author who made headlines with the Alchemist. Forgive me Coelho fans, but most of the written phrases in this novel could have easily been written by a high school student.
I know what Mr. Coelho is trying to teach us through his works: that the Divine can be manifested in Nature, that we hold the power in nurturing our dreams, and that we all have Personal Legends. As much as these tenets are inspiring and thought provoking, must he always use these themes for all his works? Of course, all authors tend to veer towards certain themes, but when we read the same sentences, the same thoughts, the same pacing through out all of their works, things could get very nauseous.
Six years ago, I read and loved the Alchemist. Now, I no longer count myself as a Coelho fan. Not until this guy writes another bestseller that’s worthy of the acclaim. And the book’s title.